MODULE 4: Reversing Language Shift






 Introduction Statement


            This module consists of a brief description of how to reverse language shift and accomplished language maintenance across generations. As discussed in previous modules, one of the main consequences of language shift is the loss of the heritage language across generations (Baker, 2006; Nawanz, Umer, Anjum, & Ramzan, 2012).  The loss of heritage language might provoke serious negative results, which principally affect the development of strong family relationships and cultural identities (Mouw & Yu, 1999; Potowski, 2013; Zhou & Bankston, 2000).

            Unfortunately, language shift is a phenomenon that is inevitable, and occurs from one generation to the next (Sofu, 2009). However, the intergenerational transmission of a language from parents to children is also common in the society, serving as a reversing process of language shift across generations (Potowsky, 2013; Tran, 2010).  This reverse side of language shift is known as language maintenance, which was defined by Mesthrie as “the continuing use of a language in the face of competition from a regionally and socially powerful or numerically stronger language” (as cited in Donghui, 2010, p. 43).

            According to several scholars, it has been found that language maintenance has several benefits (Donghui, 2010; Lanza & Svendsen, 2007; Mouw & Yu, 1999).  Some of the possible benefits of language maintenance were discussed by Donghui (2010), who explained that children of immigrants who have successfully maintained heritage language skills presumably can enjoy academic and economic advantages and at the same time benefit from the development of stronger family relations, deeper contact with their heritage community, and their country of origin through the heritage language.

            Additionally, the maintenance of a heritage language has been related to the transmission of cultural and ethnic identities, as well as the increasing possibility of bilingualism development across generations (Lanza & Svendsen, 2007; Porter & Hao, 1998; Tran, 2010).  Which according to prior investigations, bilingualism enables children of immigrants to communicate effectively with their parents who are not proficient in the language of the host country (Mouw & Yu, 1999). Furthermore, language maintenance allows the development of strong family and cultural group relationships (Potowski, 2013). Finally, language maintenance should not only be considered as a reverse process of language shift, but also as a crucial factor that contributes to the creation of positive attitudes of the younger generations to become bilingual (Sofu, 2009).
  

            To see how the language shift can be reversed and how language maintenance can be achieved, continue with the activities in this module.

No comments:

Post a Comment